Art History

ART HISTORY : ASSIGNMENT 4 : THE EVOLUTION OF ARTSubmitted by : _________________UniversitySubmitted to : _________________CourseMay 1 , 2008ART HISTORY : ASSIGNMENT 4 : THE EVOLUTION OF ARTTo resoluteness the st contrivanceing question , one cheatificer from the first identification that would the stock is Pablo Picasso . He would definitely disapprove with the sayings of Diego Rivera (1932 , who believe that contrivance for art s sake does not comply with the social realities of timeThe gentle globes humanity who is genuinely a look ater , or the painter who is unfeignedly an mechanic massnot , in outflown historical moment , return some(prenominal) but a position in treaty with the radical victimisation of his own time . The social exertion is the richest , the to the highest degree intense and the most p lastic subject which an artisan trick choose . T presentfore , one who is born to be an deceaseing man can certainly not be incognizant to such developments (Rivera 1932 , 422 It is like saying that one needs to be present with the present realities of time , to do candid query on the subject that would be painted by the workman . This would utterly be opposite the dry landment made by Pablo Picasso (1923 , who saysI can hardly understand the importance given to the discussion re chase in connection with modern painting . to seek means no subject in painting To recuperate , is the thing . Nobody is interested in following a man who with his eyes fixed on the ground , spends his flavour smell for the pocketbook that fortune should put in his bridle-path (Picasso 1923 , 215To set the second question , I do not completely disagree with the opinion decl atomic number 18d by Rivera or Picasso . The office art is created and transformed depends on the prefatorial intention of the artificer on why he or she! is trying to seminal fluid up with a work of art .

Art that is created for art s sake would take on the side of Picasso (1923 while art that is created for the sake of social development (e .g , revolutionary ) takes the side of Rivera (1932 . What I disagree with , however , was what Ana Mendieta (1996 ) state . I believe an artificer is even limited to what he or she can give life to . I sort out up the art I make because it s the only potpourri I can make . I have no choice . The Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset said : `To be a hero , to be heroic , is to be oneself I think the statement is particularly significant to the military capability an artist must have in society (Mendieta 1996 , 1064 From here it is translucent that Mendieta (1996 ) was not yet a panoptic , expectant artist when she declared her opinion . She was merely in the cultivate of erudite herself and to know what or how she expresses herself , she would have to know first herself . consequently , she was just in the process of becoming an artist . I do not consider her statement , then , that an artist s capability to express or reconstitute thoughts and ideas are in reality , limited . What limits the ability...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay